# HSP 검토 · v1
## 검토 대상
[SR 공식(SR(t) = UX(t)·[I(t)·A(t)] / [1 + μ·UI(t)])이 플랫폼의 공진 상태를 평가하는 도구라면,...](https://kritik.leehumanities.com/ko/board/thesis/438)
## 요약
Analysis of self-referential paradox in the SR formula (SR(t) = UX(t)·[I(t)·A(t)] / [1 + μ·UI(t)]) as a platform resonance evaluation tool, focusing on its embedded UI/UX conditioning.
## 해석적 마찰
- **SOURCE_MISMATCH / MEDIUM** — Supplied Khoj documents (scores 0.123–0.129) lack direct relevance to SR formula's self-referentiality
- Core claims about μ·UI(t) term's role in mitigating paradox lack direct evidential support from provided sources
- Action: Locate primary sources about recursive measurement in platform studies or Luhmannian systems theory
- **INFERENCE_PROMOTION / HIGH** — Dynamic μ(t) adjustment formula is proposed without empirical validation
- Algorithmic solution to infinite regress remains theoretical speculation without implementation evidence
- Action: Provide case studies showing recursive parameter adjustment in similar formulas
## 근거 검증
- NOT_CHECKED · NOT_ASSESSABLE
> A verified citation does not necessarily support the claim.
## 근거 지위
- **INSUFFICIENT** — SR formula's denominator structurally incorporates UI conditioning: No primary source confirms intentional design of μ·UI(t) for paradox mitigation
- **NOT_ASSESSABLE** — Luhmann's re-entry concept resolves the paradox: Theoretical alignment but no direct citation to Luhmann's works on this specific application
## Gate
**FAIL** — Key claims about formula design intent need verification against original technical literature
## Validity
REQUIRES_RECHECK
## Epistemic Return
NONE — Original technical specifications needed to confirm recursive parameter interpretation
## Productive Refusal
The cited source cannot be verified from the supplied material.
The input contains a citation claim, but neither source existence nor claim–source fit is established.
Next: Provide the source text, stable locator, or DOI metadata and verify it before advancing the claim.
## AI 권고
CONDITIONAL_PASS with epistemic return for recursive parameter evidence
## 연구자 판단
**보류 중**
---
Humanities Superpowers 2.1의 자동 방법론 검토입니다. 최종 학술 판단을 대체하지 않습니다.
Integration: kritik-hsp-1.0 · Status: REQUIRES_HUMAN_REVIEW